By Daniel Robin
In communicating with other people, what matters more: what we intend to
convey, or the actual response we get? Who is responsible for your communication? The
meaning of our communication is not what we think it means. It is based on the
response we get from the other person. It is pointless to insist on a meaning that is lost
on the listener, especially when the response you get is entirely separate from your
intent.
For example, we might intend to pay someone a compliment, and if
they take it the wrong way, what can we do about that? Would it make sense to argue that
they should just take it as a compliment and chill out? Perhaps a better approach is to
notice that for them to receive it, compliments must be delivered differently.
Choice Is Better Than No Choice
If we become conscious of how we produce responses in other people, we
will have additional choices. If were triggering an unintended response, understand
how it happens. The trigger may be as subtle as tone of voice or a certain facial
expression; these non-verbal cues say more than our words. If the relationship is
important, let the other person know you want to understand what they are getting from
you.
For example, a client of mine, call her Kathy, found herself repeatedly in
a conflict with a coworker. She speaks and acts in ways that trigger the other person to
get instantly upset and frustrated. This pattern has been going on for quite some time.
They are both to the point where they try to avoid each other a useful coping
strategy, but not likely to resolve the conflict.
To start, I suggested that she discover what she does (or
doesnt do) that leads to these strong reactions. My suggestion doesnt imply
that she is doing anything wrong. Its only about the response she gets: use it as
feedback. Once she owns how she influences the interactions, she can decide to either
continue doing the same thing (and hope that the coworker or the circumstances change), or
she can try something different.
I Said, She Said
Currently, Kathys pattern is an automatic "calibrated
loop" similar to how "dysfunction" patterns get set up in family
systems you say this, and they say that, and you say... and the next thing you know
nobody is listening and theres that all-too-familiar feeling again. So, what we can
do is remember our goal, and look for alternative ways to get there. Does it make sense to
wait for them to change, to act more cooperatively, to notice how inappropriately
they are behaving?
Famous definition of insanity: doing the same thing over and over and
expecting a different result.
Sharing Power in Communication
Communication, like driving in traffic, is a cooperative system. Kathy can
produce an instant reaction in the other person with just a glance. Isnt it amazing
that we have such power to influence others?
Contrary to what you might expect, the person who has the most flexibility
in a communication situation will generally have the most control over that situation.
How flexible are you? If theres a behavior you cannot generate for whatever
reason theres probably a response you wont be able to elicit from that
other person. And if the meaning of your communication is the response you get, that
behavior might be exactly the one you need to produce.
Try Anything Else
If youre having a tough time influencing someone in the direction
you want to go, trying flexing over to their world and first "meet them where they
are" (see previous article). If youre producing an unintended result, remember
your goal, and then get some feedback about how you are getting that result. With that
feedback, you can plan out different ways to move with the other person toward your
desired outcome.
Theres a saying: when what youre doing isnt working, try
anything else. When you maintain a state of curiosity, you can try doing something
anything different, perceive the response, and learn from it. Did you move toward
your goal? Ask for feedback. Keep experimenting.
Discuss
this topic
online using ABetterWorkplace
FORUM (free
registration)
|